New York’s AI Disclosure Law Takes Effect June 9. If Your Amazon Listings Feature AI-Generated Models, You Need to Act Now.

13 May 2026

New York’s AI Disclosure Law Takes Effect June 9. If Your Amazon Listings Feature AI-Generated Models, You Need to Act Now.

AI-generated lifestyle models have become standard practice for Amazon sellers. The quality has improved dramatically, the cost is a fraction of traditional photography, and the turnaround time is measured in hours rather than weeks. Most brands have adopted them without a second thought.

That calculus just changed — at least for content reaching New York audiences.

What the Law Actually Says

On December 11, 2025, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed S.8420-A/A.8887-B into law — described by the Governor’s office as first-in-the-nation legislation to protect consumers and boost AI transparency in advertising.

The law amends New York General Business Law § 396-b and takes effect June 9, 2026. It requires all persons producing or creating advertisements that include AI-generated synthetic performers to conspicuously disclose that fact.

The definition matters here. A “synthetic performer” is any humanlike figure generated or substantially altered by AI software to appear as a person performing in a commercial advertisement. This is not limited to obviously synthetic CGI characters. It covers AI-generated lifestyle models that look entirely human — the kind increasingly used in Amazon product imagery, A+ content, and brand store visuals. Amazon

The law applies to any commercial advertising produced or created for distribution in New York, covering brands, agencies, franchises, and local production partners. It even extends to influencer marketing campaigns and regional content. There are exclusions for audio-only content, AI used solely for translation, and marketing for expressive works like films where the synthetic performer regularly appears in the underlying work — but standard product advertising does not qualify for those exclusions.

Why Amazon Sellers Are Directly in Scope

The geographic reach of this law is the critical detail for any brand selling on Amazon.

This legislation applies to any usage of synthetic performers in advertisements distributed to New York audiences, regardless of whether the advertiser is located outside of the state. Amazon listings are accessible to every shopper in New York. That makes them advertisements distributed to a New York audience, which puts them squarely within the scope of the requirement.

There is also a federal dimension worth tracking. On December 11, 2025 — the same day Governor Hochul signed the bill — the White House issued a sweeping Executive Order seeking to pause all state-level AI regulation in favor of a yet-to-be-determined federal standard. The Executive Order signals the need for a single national AI law that would preempt state AI laws. Though some states may face aggressive federal challenges, the Executive Order itself is likely to be challenged in court. In the face of that uncertainty, the practical guidance is clear: prepare for compliance with the New York law and monitor federal developments. June 9 is not moving.

What Non-Compliance Actually Costs

Failure to comply with the disclosure requirement may result in civil penalties of $1,000 for a first violation and $5,000 per subsequent violation. The statute does not provide a private cause of action — enforcement comes through civil penalties rather than individual lawsuits — but the escalating structure means repeated violations compound quickly.

For brands running multiple ASINs with AI-generated lifestyle imagery across hundreds of assets, the exposure is not trivial. A systematic audit of existing content is worth the time.

What “Conspicuous Disclosure” Means in Practice

The law requires the disclosure to be conspicuous — meaning it has to be visible and legible, not buried in fine print. For Amazon content, this translates to a small text disclaimer added directly to the image or included clearly in the listing.

Practical options that work for Amazon product imagery:

“This advertisement features AI-generated models.” — clean, neutral, directly compliant.

“Imagery includes AI-generated models.” — minimal, easy to incorporate into existing layouts.

“AI-generated models. Human-obsessed creative.” — brand-forward, for sellers who want to lean into the transparency rather than just meet the minimum requirement.

The implementation is straightforward. Open the asset in any design tool, add the disclaimer as a visible text layer, and re-upload to Seller Central. For most assets, this is a 10-minute task per image once the template is set.

The more time-consuming part is the audit — identifying which existing assets in your catalog feature AI-generated human figures, and prioritizing which to update before June 9. Start with your highest-traffic ASINs and main listing images. A+ content and brand store imagery should follow.

The Broader Context

New York is the first state to pass this specific requirement, but it reflects a regulatory direction that is accelerating nationally. New York’s synthetic performer law builds upon the efforts of lawmakers across the US seeking to regulate AI-powered technologies and follows the enactment of numerous state laws governing AI chatbots during 2025. Other states are watching. A federal standard may eventually replace or supplement state laws — but that timeline is uncertain, and June 9 is not.

The law was strongly supported by SAG-AFTRA, the professional performers’ union, which has been adopting its own requirements to protect working performers from being displaced by AI-generated synthetic performers or unfairly replicated using generative AI technologies. The compliance pressure here is not just regulatory — it reflects a broader shift in how AI-generated content in advertising is being treated by regulators, unions, and increasingly, consumers.

For brands that have built AI-generated lifestyle imagery into their content workflow, this is not a reason to change the workflow. It is a reason to add one step: the disclosure. The cost is minimal. The alternative is a $5,000 per-violation exposure on every piece of non-compliant content distributed to New York audiences.

June 9 is four weeks away. The audit should already be underway.

Important note: This post shares publicly available information about a new law and practical implementation considerations. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult your legal counsel to determine what compliance looks like for your specific situation.

If you want to stay updated on Amazon changes, subscribe to our blog.

If you need support with PPC, DSP, AMC, analytics, or a long-term growth strategy, contact the ANavigator team at info@anavigator.co

🚀 Book a call to get a FREE AUDIT by the link below: 🚀
⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
Book a call – FREE AUDIT

 

Follow my Weekly Newsletter on LinkedIn:
 / amazon-digest-for-brands-7232361008185372672  
Follow me on LinkedIn:
 / ookovalov 
Follow ANavigator on social media:
 / anavigator  
 /@anavigator_official
 / anavigator7  
 / @anavigators  

 

LinkedIn page to contact us:

 

Author: Oleksandr Kovalov
Role: Founder & CEO @ ANavigator
— The ANavigator Team

our activity

News and podcasts

LATEST UPDATES

Amazon Is Deprecating Product Collections in February 2027. Here Is What to Migrate and When.
Blog
September 3, 2026
Amazon Is Deprecating Product Collections in February 2027. Here Is What to Migrate and When.
Amazon launched Sponsored Brands Collections in April 2026 as the direct replacement for the legacy Product Collections format. The old format stops being supported in February 2027. If you are still running Product Collection campaigns, the migration window is open now, and the performance case for moving is strong. What Changed and Why It Matters The legacy Product Collections format allowed up to three ASINs per ad, required a custom headline, and let advertisers upload lifestyle images for top-of-search placements. That format is being retired. Sponsored Brands Collections replaces it with two formats, Automatic and Manual, both supporting three to ten ASINs per ad instead of three. Early test data from Amazon shows the new format delivers 3.3x higher click-through rate, 14.2% higher ROAS, and 81.9% more orders per search compared to legacy Product Collections. The reason for that lift is structural. More products per ad unit means broader catalog exposure in a single placement. And when shoppers reach the continuation experience, either a dynamically created landing page or a Brand Store, same-brand conversion reaches 25.8% versus 15.9% on a single product detail page, with 2.4x more products from the brand viewed per session. Automatic vs. Manual Collections The two formats serve different needs. Automatic Collections let Amazon's AI dynamically group the most relevant products from your catalog based on keyword targets and shopper search queries. Titles and landing pages are auto-generated and update continuously. You do not need to manually select ASINs or build multiple campaigns. Use this when you want scale with minimal ongoing management, particularly across large catalogs where manually maintaining collection groupings is operationally impractical. Manual Collections let you choose which three to ten ASINs appear in the ad, with the option to write your own headline or let Amazon generate one. Targeting supports both keyword and product targeting, unlike Automatic Collections, which are keyword-only. Use this when you want control over which products are grouped, for thematic collections, hero product groupings, or category-specific campaigns. Both formats link individual products to their product detail pages, with the brand logo and ad title linking to the landing page or Brand Store. The Migration Timeline You can start migrating now. In September 2026, Amazon will add recommended migrations directly inside Campaign Manager with a bulk migration option. Go to the Sponsored Brands tab to review and launch recommended replacements. In February 2027, Product Collections stop being supported entirely. Eligible campaigns with exactly three ASINs will be automatically transitioned to Manual Collections. Campaigns with fewer than three ASINs will not auto-migrate and will simply stop running. That last point is critical: any Product Collection campaign built around one or two ASINs will go dark in February 2027 with no automatic fallback. If those campaigns are still live and unreviewed, they disappear without warning. What to Do Now Three actions before September's bulk migration tool arrives. First, audit your active Sponsored Brands Product Collection campaigns and flag any with fewer than three ASINs. These need manual attention, either add ASINs to qualify for migration or shift the strategy to a different ad type before February. Second, decide which campaigns warrant Automatic versus Manual Collections. High-volume keyword campaigns across a broad catalog are natural candidates for Automatic. Curated groupings, seasonal collections, bundled products, and category leaders are better suited to Manual, where you control the ASIN selection. Third, review your ASIN pool for each campaign. Since Automatic Collections dynamically select from your catalog, the quality of what goes in matters. Include products with strong conversion rates, competitive pricing, and solid review counts. Weak ASINs in the pool dilute the AI's ability to surface the best combination. The September bulk migration tool will make the mechanical part easy. The strategic decisions- which format, which ASINs, which groupings- are the work that needs to happen before then. If you want to stay updated on Amazon changes, subscribe to our blog. If you need support with PPC, DSP, AMC, analytics, or a long-term growth strategy, contact the ANavigator team at info@anavigator.co  Book a call to get a FREE AUDIT by the link below:     Book a call – FREE AUDIT   Follow my Weekly Newsletter on LinkedIn:  / amazon-digest-for-brands-7232361008185372672   Follow me on LinkedIn:  / ookovalov Follow ANavigator on social media:  / anavigator    /@anavigator_official  / anavigator7    / @anavigators     LinkedIn page to contact us:   Author: Oleksandr Kovalov Role: Founder & CEO @ ANavigator — The ANavigator Team
Learn more
The FTC Just Sued Amazon Over Sponsored Ads Pricing. Here Is What Every Advertiser Should Understand.
Blog
September 1, 2026
The FTC Just Sued Amazon Over Sponsored Ads Pricing. Here Is What Every Advertiser Should Understand.
On August 31, 2026, the FTC and 22 state attorneys general filed suit against Amazon in federal court. The complaint alleges that for over seven years Amazon secretly inflated the prices that more than one million brands and sellers paid to advertise on its platform, extracting tens of billions of dollars from advertisers who believed they were participating in a fair auction. This does not change how you run campaigns today. But it changes what you know. What Amazon Told Advertisers - and What the FTC Alleges Amazon described its advertising auctions as generalized second-price (GSP) auctions. The promise: you bid your maximum, and if you win, you pay just enough to beat the next highest bidder, not your full bid. That framing appeared on Amazon's website, in training materials, and in direct presentations to advertisers. The FTC alleges that starting in 2019, Amazon changed how the auction actually worked without telling anyone. Amazon introduced what it internally called a "soft reserve price", a hidden minimum calculated after the auction determined the winner. If the soft reserve exceeded the price generated by competition, Amazon charged that amount instead. One internal document described the result as a "surchargedSecondPrice" with "a surcharge hidden in it." Another referenced what Amazon called an "invented auction participant", effectively a shill bid to push prices higher. By 2024, Sponsored Products advertisers were allegedly paying their own bid amount approximately 80% of the time, up from 30-40% in 2021. A nominally second-price auction was functionally operating as first-price the vast majority of the time. Internal documents quoted in the complaint show Amazon acknowledged that revealing the surcharges would cause "irrevocable damage to advertiser trust." A 2024 discussion between senior Amazon executives described the approach as a "clever non-transparent way to charge first price" that had been "incredibly effective" at driving revenue. Amazon's Response Amazon called the lawsuit "misguided" and disputed every core allegation. Its main arguments: average winning bids for Sponsored Products fell 50% from 2019 to 2025. Average cost-per-click remained flat adjusted for inflation from 2019 through 2024, while conversion rates grew 24%. Advertisers paid the same or less and got better results. In 2026, Amazon estimates advertisers will deliver 58% higher sales and 46% better ROAS compared to a bid-only ranking model. On soft reserve pricing, Amazon says it is a standard industry tool reflecting the true market value of a placement, similar to minimum prices on physical retail shelf space. It says advertisers never pay more than their bid, and that the materials the FTC calls misleading were low-reach training content with a combined 1,849 enrollments across three courses over their entire lifetimes. What Is Actually in Dispute Both sides agree on the core facts: Amazon introduced soft reserve pricing in 2018-2019 and did not proactively disclose this to advertisers. The dispute is whether that constituted deception and caused measurable harm. The FTC says advertisers bid higher than they would have known the auction was effectively first-price. Amazon says advertisers optimize on real-world performance, not auction format descriptions, so the mechanism did not change behavior or outcomes. These are genuine legal disputes that will be resolved in court over months or years. What This Means for Your Campaigns The lawsuit does not change how the auction works today. The soft reserve pricing has been operating throughout the entire period of your campaign history. What it does raise: if Amazon's auction functions closer to first-price than second-price for most transactions, the optimal bidding strategy differs from a second-price assumption. In a genuine second-price auction, bidding your true value is rational; you only pay the next bidder's price. In a first-price environment, that means consistently paying your full bid. The rational response is bid shading, lowering bids to find the actual clearing price. Look at your account data. If you pay close to your maximum bid most of the time, your bidding strategy may not be calibrated for the auction you are actually participating in. The case is filed, and Amazon will contest it. Follow the developments; the outcome could affect how Amazon is required to operate and communicate its advertising auctions going forward. This post reflects publicly available information from the FTC complaint, Amazon's official response, and reporting as of August 31, 2026. It does not constitute legal or financial advice. If you want to stay updated on Amazon changes, subscribe to our blog. If you need support with PPC, DSP, AMC, analytics, or a long-term growth strategy, contact the ANavigator team at info@anavigator.co  Book a call to get a FREE AUDIT using the link below:     Book a call – FREE AUDIT   Follow my Weekly Newsletter on LinkedIn:  / amazon-digest-for-brands-7232361008185372672   Follow me on LinkedIn:  / ookovalov  Follow ANavigator on social media:  / anavigator    /@anavigator_official  / anavigator7    / @anavigators     LinkedIn page to contact us:   Author: Oleksandr Kovalov Role: Founder & CEO @ ANavigator — The ANavigator Team
Learn more